W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > July 2012

Re: [css3-flexbox] Paint flex items atomically?

From: Morten Stenshorne <mstensho@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:53:53 +0200
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <87txx7szke.fsf@aeneas.oslo.osa>
fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> writes:

> On 06/28/2012 05:00 AM, Morten Stenshorne wrote:
>> Should flex items be treated as if they sort of establish a new stacking
>> context (except for descendants that are positioned or create true
>> stacking contexts on their own)? I'm talking about what
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/zindex.html has to say about inline-block,
>> inline-table and floats.
>
> Hi Morten,
>
> The CSSWG couldn't think of a good reason to make flex items
> establish pseudo-stacking contexts, so we have resolved to
> treat them the same way as block and table cell elements.
> Please let us know if this is satisfactory, or if you have
> further information for us to consider. :)

I'm fine with this. I just wanted a clarification. Thanks!

-- 
---- Morten Stenshorne, developer, Opera Software ASA ----
---- Office: +47 23692400 ------ Mobile: +47 93440112 ----
------------------ http://www.opera.com/ -----------------
Received on Tuesday, 17 July 2012 05:58:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:56 GMT