W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

RE: [CSSWG] Agenda conf call 29-feb-2012

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:14:04 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <3C4041FF83E1E04A986B6DC50F01782903447AC3@TK5EX14MBXC295.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

[Tab Atkins Jr.:]
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 11:54 AM, Daniel Glazman
> <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> > 4. Normative references to WHATWG html
> > --------------------------------------
> >
> > Tab wants to make a normative reference from css3-images to the WHATWG
> > html spec for paint sources. We should discuss it. The last 15 minutes
> > of our call will be allocated to this.
> >
> > See thread starting at
> > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2012Feb/0252.html

> 
> I'm not actually making a normative reference, though that wasn't
> completely clear from the way I phrased things.  I've rewritten that
> paragraph into a note and made it clearer that the reference to HTML is
> simply an example of how host languages can extend the set of things
> element() matches against.

Cool. This area is also at risk.

> We can use this time for generic discussion about this issue, if you'd
> like, but there's no pressing need.

Agree. I do want to hear about where we are in terms of DoC, moving to CR etc.

> If we do, we should broaden it to all non-W3C references, like RFCs, which
> we definitely refer to in some places.
> 
> ~TJ
> 

Received on Tuesday, 28 February 2012 22:14:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:51 GMT