- From: Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com>
- Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 10:58:08 -0800
- To: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Would there be a replacement of CSSValue? I have nothing in mind if CSSTransformValue gets renamed into CSSTransform and doesn't inherit from CSSValue at all. Dirk On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:50 AM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote: > On Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:43:05 +0100, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Aryeh, >> >> On Feb 16, 2012, at 10:20 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Dirk Schulze <dschulze@adobe.com> >>> wrote: >>>> Hi www-style, >>>> >>>> I would like to see some changes to the current interfaces of CSS >>>> Transforms. This is also described in the Wiki "Merged Transforms"[0]. >>>> Currently CSS Transforms specifies 'CSSMatrix' and 'CSSTransformValue'. >>> >>> But it defines no way to obtain either type of object: >>> >>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15443 >>> https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=16003 >> At least for WebKit and Mozilla there is a way to get them: >> getPropertyCSSValue(). It should be the biggest concern of CSSOM to >> address that! In the meantime we can specify the interfaces and make >> sure that they work when all browsers support either getPropertyCSSValue >> or another way to access it from CSSOM. > > I think this stuff has already been obsoleted, and that this was why most > of it (except CSSMatrix for some reason, though there was no way to > retrieve it) was removed, from the CSSWG 2d draft, at least. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Oct/0011.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Sep/0120.html > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2003Oct/0347.html > > -- > Øyvind Stenhaug > Core Norway, Opera Software ASA >
Received on Thursday, 16 February 2012 18:58:42 UTC