W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: Transforms specs

From: Simon Fraser <simon.fraser@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0100
Message-id: <60052CA6-9697-42B4-A711-44F25AF6FB20@apple.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "public-fx@w3.org" <public-fx@w3.org>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>

On Feb 9, 2012, at 11:42 AM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> As before [1], I'm lost in a maze of transform specs.
> 
> There was an item yesterday on the CSS meeting agenda to obsolete
> css3-2d-transforms and css3-3d-transforms with a merged transforms
> spec, and Simon also said he'd been fixing 3-D issues in that merged
> spec.  I was assuming that the spec being proposed as the
> replacement spec was
> http://dev.w3.org/Graphics-FX/modules/2D-transforms/spec/2DTransforms.html
> but I now realize it might be
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-transforms/ .
> 
> Which spec is the proposed replacement transforms spec?

It's the csswg one. We should remove the GFX one.

Simon

> 
> -David
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-fx/2011OctDec/0195.html
> 
> -- 
> 𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
> 𝄢   Mozilla                           http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
> 
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 11:47:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT