Re: WG consensus on lobbying WG members that they are taking the wrong way? from Tab Atkins Jr. on 2012-02-09 (www-style@w3.org from February 2012)

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 02:38:15 -0800
To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBVstDjbsQLP6fcnptyRws5jKHn_iNRh+y-x9toTFT1Ag@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 2:24 AM, Daniel Glazman
<daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote:
> Le 09/02/12 11:05, Tab Atkins Jr. a écrit :
>> We (Google) were also not part of any such consensus.  Daniel, please
>> either clarify that statement or remove Google from your post.
>
> I do apologize for that and this is fixed. The first paragraph's
> article does now mention the 1st half represents the dicussions,
> the 2nd half if mine. The word "decision" was entirely removed.
> Let me know is this this enough.

This seems fine.

~TJ

Received on Thursday, 9 February 2012 10:39:10 UTC