W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: [css3-transforms] Making transform-origin a list, converting transform to comma separated

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 18:19:09 +1300
Message-ID: <CAOp6jLZR7ttMxiYtH934QRgbExmz42iROjo+2gAEqa-cWNarQQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
Cc: Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com> wrote:

> And what's the point of WD and prefixes if backwards compatibility is that
> big an issue even in that case? If nothing can change in transforms any
> more, why doesn't it move to CR?
>

We can change things, just not things that lots of sites are commonly
depending on. So we can probably change the behavior of most edge cases,
for example.

But you're absolutely right, there's no point in transforms (and
transitions and animations) remaining prefixed now. That's why, not long
ago, I argued strongly that we should unprefix them.

Rob
-- 
"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not
in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us
our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not
sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word is not in us." [1 John
1:8-10]
Received on Tuesday, 7 February 2012 05:23:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT