W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2012

Re: <di>? Please?

From: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 02:31:05 +0200
Message-ID: <4F2C7C49.8020808@gmail.com>
To: "Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com" <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
CC: www-style@w3.org, Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com>, whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>
On 4/2/12 02:17, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
> 04.02.2012, 04:15, "Lea Verou"<leaverou@gmail.com>:
>> On 4/2/12 02:14, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
>>
>>>   DIVs are disallowed as direct children of lists due to purely theoretical limitation while in practice they work.
>>
>> Exactly. That won't change, so I don't see what your problem is.
>>
>> --
>> Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)
>
> Problem is that this limitation is purely theoretical while working in real practice.

It's a current limitation too. It won't be made *more* invalid, if 
that's even a thing :)

Also, the same could be said for everything, even arbitrary elements. 
Should HTML just allow anything, anywhere, like XML?

-- 
Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)
Received on Saturday, 4 February 2012 00:31:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:50 GMT