Re: <di>? Please? from Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com on 2012-02-04 (www-style@w3.org from February 2012)

From: Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2012 04:17:01 +0400
To: Lea Verou <leaverou@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style@w3.org,Hugh Guiney <hugh.guiney@gmail.com>,whatwg <whatwg@whatwg.org>
Message-Id: <97111328314621@web56.yandex.ru>

04.02.2012, 04:15, "Lea Verou" <leaverou@gmail.com>:
> On 4/2/12 02:14, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote:
>
>>  DIVs are disallowed as direct children of lists due to purely theoretical limitation while in practice they work.
>
> Exactly. That won't change, so I don't see what your problem is.
>
> --
> Lea Verou (http://lea.verou.me | @LeaVerou)

Problem is that this limitation is purely theoretical while working in real practice.

Received on Saturday, 4 February 2012 00:17:34 UTC