W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

Re: when do transitions occur?

From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:32:29 -0700
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20110915153229.GA10138@pickering.dbaron.org>
On Thursday 2011-09-15 08:12 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > Regarding David's comment about background-image not being animatable, this WD suggests it is somewhat supported...
> > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#properties-from-css-
> > #       background-image        only gradients
> 
> That's weird.  I *had* a definition for gradient transitions in Images
> 3, but I also had a definition for generic <image>s, and they were
> kicked to level 4 at the same time.  I dunno why Transitions would
> reference only gradients.

The TR-page draft is quite old; the reference to background-image
being animatable at all has been dropped from the editor's draft for
quite a while.

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla Corporation               http://www.mozilla.com/   𝄂
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 15:33:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:44 GMT