- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:12:58 -0700
- To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote: > Regarding David's comment about background-image not being animatable, this WD suggests it is somewhat supported... > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#properties-from-css- > # background-image only gradients That's weird. I *had* a definition for gradient transitions in Images 3, but I also had a definition for generic <image>s, and they were kicked to level 4 at the same time. I dunno why Transitions would reference only gradients. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 15:13:46 UTC