W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2011

RE: when do transitions occur?

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:31:28 +0000
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <9710FCC2E88860489239BE0308AC5D17161B12@TK5EX14MBXC266.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Request: David, can you make sure a link to the ED gets added to the WD below?

A general web search for "CSS3 transitions" hits on the WD and I went looking briefly to see if there was a (newer) ED but didn't find one quickly.

Thanks!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: L. David Baron [mailto:dbaron@dbaron.org]
> Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2011 8:32 AM
> To: Tab Atkins Jr.
> Cc: Brian Manthos; Øyvind Stenhaug; www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Re: when do transitions occur?
> 
> On Thursday 2011-09-15 08:12 -0700, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:41 AM, Brian Manthos
> <brianman@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > > Regarding David's comment about background-image not being
> animatable, this WD suggests it is somewhat supported...
> > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-transitions/#properties-from-css-

> > > #       background-image        only gradients
> >
> > That's weird.  I *had* a definition for gradient transitions in
> Images
> > 3, but I also had a definition for generic <image>s, and they were
> > kicked to level 4 at the same time.  I dunno why Transitions would
> > reference only gradients.
> 
> The TR-page draft is quite old; the reference to background-image
> being animatable at all has been dropped from the editor's draft for
> quite a while.
> 
> -David
> 
> --
> 𝄞   L. David Baron                         http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
> 𝄢   Mozilla Corporation               http://www.mozilla.com/   𝄂

Received on Thursday, 15 September 2011 19:32:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:44 GMT