W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [css-image] gradients, animations and photosensitive epilepsy

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 13:11:58 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTikPbW9CSKFFQacviMzshyoJKTGKvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
Cc: CSS 3 W3C Group <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I do believe that the gradient that is seen on this page should never be
> allow to work.
> http://css-class.com/test/css/3/gradients/repeating-radial-gradients-danger.htm
> Even for an author who may have worked with some gradients, the results of
> using such small distances between color stops could cause someone with
> photosensitive epilepsy [1] to have a seizure without warning. I myself find
> it hard to scroll this gradient.
> I do suggest that the CSS WG get feedback from several people who are
> qualified in the field of photosensitive epilepsy regarding certain
> gradients and animations.
> I myself have always been careful in the use of color with my test and
> demos. I do avoid using large segments of red, yellow or fuchsia as
> background colors. This is since my wife has a form of photosensitive
> epilepsy. I will be changing some of my own animations (increasing
> transparency). One has already been changed.

Luckily, that's an extremely ugly gradient that should never see the
light of day in a real website.

More importantly, the fact that the gradient is produced with a CSS
function is irrelevant; it could just as easily have been produced as
a normal image.  While we shouldn't make it *easy* to do bad visual
effects if there's no good reason, there's no way to actually prevent
bad design here.

Received on Friday, 27 May 2011 20:12:45 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:46 UTC