W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

RE: [css3-backgrounds][css3-images] Layers in shorthand (was Re: [css3-images] exactly 2 adjacent colors stops)

From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 18:40:23 +0000
To: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <FA122FEC823D524CB516E4E0374D9DCF1FB03352@TK5EX14MBXC136.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Glad you got it working. :)

- Brian


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alan Gresley [mailto:alan@css-class.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 5:20 AM
> To: Brad Kemper
> Cc: Brian Manthos; L. David Baron; Tab Atkins Jr.; Philippe Wittenbergh;
> www-style list
> Subject: [css3-backgrounds][css3-images] Layers in shorthand (was Re: [css3-
> images] exactly 2 adjacent colors stops)
> 
> On 26/05/2011 10:17 AM, Brad Kemper wrote:
> >
> > On May 25, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Brian Manthos<brianman@microsoft.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> The<bg-position>  information is required if you want to
> >> specify<bg-size>  in your shorthand value.
> >
> > I remember that battle. I thought authors should be able to do it the
> > way Alan expected to. But I lost the argument. Sorry Alan.
> 
> 
> No need to apologize Brad. I presume that battle was during my one year
> hiatus from www-style. I was to resub to the list in late 2009 to discover that
> my proposal to include a forward slash in a background shorthand to allow for
> a fallback background-color [1] was to be used instead as the means to
> include background-size in a background shorthand.
> 
> 
> Thank you Brian for helping me with my CSS. Now reloaded with two
> background shorthands.
> 
> http://css-class.com/test/css/3/backgrounds/background-slash-

> shorthand.htm
> 
> 
> One for IE9 and another for IE10 which has prefixed (-ms-) gradients.
> You will get the concept of the demo and the affect that I after by resizing
> the width of the viewport. It somewhat like an animation affect without
> using CSS3 animation. Just wondering, is IE10 going to support
> CSS3 animation?
> 
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0116.html

> 
> 
> --
> Alan Gresley
> http://css-3d.org/

> http://css-class.com/


Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 18:40:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:40 GMT