- From: Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 22:19:46 +1000
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Philippe Wittenbergh <ph.wittenbergh@l-c-n.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 26/05/2011 10:17 AM, Brad Kemper wrote: > > On May 25, 2011, at 1:07 PM, Brian Manthos<brianman@microsoft.com> > wrote: > >> >> The<bg-position> information is required if you want to >> specify<bg-size> in your shorthand value. > > I remember that battle. I thought authors should be able to do it the > way Alan expected to. But I lost the argument. Sorry Alan. No need to apologize Brad. I presume that battle was during my one year hiatus from www-style. I was to resub to the list in late 2009 to discover that my proposal to include a forward slash in a background shorthand to allow for a fallback background-color [1] was to be used instead as the means to include background-size in a background shorthand. Thank you Brian for helping me with my CSS. Now reloaded with two background shorthands. http://css-class.com/test/css/3/backgrounds/background-slash-shorthand.htm One for IE9 and another for IE10 which has prefixed (-ms-) gradients. You will get the concept of the demo and the affect that I after by resizing the width of the viewport. It somewhat like an animation affect without using CSS3 animation. Just wondering, is IE10 going to support CSS3 animation? [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Apr/0116.html -- Alan Gresley http://css-3d.org/ http://css-class.com/
Received on Thursday, 26 May 2011 12:20:15 UTC