W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2011

Re: [css3-images] What does image-resolution apply to?

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 22:16:22 -0700
Message-ID: <4DDC90A6.8050600@inkedblade.net>
To: www-style@w3.org
On 05/24/2011 07:48 PM, Brad Kemper wrote:
>
> On May 24, 2011, at 7:36 PM, MURAKAMI Shinyu wrote:
>
>> We have not implemented the image() function yet, but if we can use
>> the image() function to change the resolution of images used in CSS properties,
>> the image-resolution property can apply to all (including background) as
>> default resolution (authors can change using the image() function).
>> So the #2 option seems good for me.
>
> So it seems there is an advantage to using 'image-resolution': the value
> is inherited, so that you could set it once on, say, the body, and you
> don't have to set it again unless you want to override it on individual
> images (which you can then do via image() if you want).

Yes, I was thinking this makes the most sense.

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 25 May 2011 05:16:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:40 GMT