W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

Re: [CSS2.1] list-style-image sizing rules don't match reality

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 17:01:20 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=KdwvjMxuEUie6Ws7pkg_wjTMwciiMOwhMwDBG@mail.gmail.com>
To: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Arron Eicholz
<Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote:
> Thank you for your feedback. The CSSWG has addressed your concerns in the upcoming publication of the CSS 2.1 specification[1].
>
> The CSSWG resolved to update the specification:
>
>   # 1. If the image has an intrinsic width or height, then that intrinsic
>   #    width/height becomes the image's used width/height.
>   # 2. If the image's intrinsic width or height is given as a percentage,
>   #    then that percentage is resolved against 1em.
>   # 3. If the image has a width but no height or vice versa, the missing
>   #    dimension is calculated from the intrinsic ratio (if any).
>   # 4. If the image's width or height cannot be resolved from the rules above,
>   #    then that dimension is assumed to be 1em.
>
> We hope this closes your issue.
>
> Please respond before 18 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current resolution.

We did *not* resolve to update the specification in that manner;
that's just fantasai's most recent proposal, which we determined
during the ftf was insufficient.  According to
<http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-224>, we accepted my
proposal.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 00:02:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:38 GMT