W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > March 2011

RE: [CSS2.1] list-style-image sizing rules don't match reality

From: Arron Eicholz <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 00:11:07 +0000
To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <07349ECFC3608F48BC3B10459913E70B12CFD6BF@TK5EX14MBXC132.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
On Monday, March 14, 2011 5:01 PM Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Arron Eicholz
> <Arron.Eicholz@microsoft.com> wrote:
> > Thank you for your feedback. The CSSWG has addressed your concerns in
> the upcoming publication of the CSS 2.1 specification[1].
> >
> > The CSSWG resolved to update the specification:
> >
> >   # 1. If the image has an intrinsic width or height, then that
> > intrinsic
> >   #    width/height becomes the image's used width/height.
> >   # 2. If the image's intrinsic width or height is given as a
> > percentage,
> >   #    then that percentage is resolved against 1em.
> >   # 3. If the image has a width but no height or vice versa, the
> > missing
> >   #    dimension is calculated from the intrinsic ratio (if any).
> >   # 4. If the image's width or height cannot be resolved from the
> > rules above,
> >   #    then that dimension is assumed to be 1em.
> >
> > We hope this closes your issue.
> >
> > Please respond before 18 March, 2011 if you do not accept the current
> resolution.
> 
> We did *not* resolve to update the specification in that manner; that's just
> fantasai's most recent proposal, which we determined during the ftf was
> insufficient.  According to <http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-224>, we
> accepted my proposal.
> 

I knew in responding to so many of these I was going to get one or two of the incorrect.

Thanks for catching my mistake. You are correct it does say accept your proposal.

--
Thanks,
Arron Eicholz



Received on Tuesday, 15 March 2011 00:11:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:38 GMT