W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2011

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions F2F Kyoto Sat: CSS3 Fonts, Regions, @viewport, Variables, @supports, Selectors4, Administrivia

From: Vincent Hardy <vhardy@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 08:24:34 -0700
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <CA1B7875.812E%vhardy@adobe.com>
Hello,

Since different people have different recollections of what was said or
decided, it seems that we should discuss this again in an upcoming telecon
to get a clearly documented resolution.

As I said, I do not have strong feelings either way: my email was sharing
what my own notes from the meeting captured, as I was building the list of
changes to make in the next revision of the draft and resolutions on the
issues raised in the spec.

Vincent

On 6/12/11 11:33 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:

>On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 9:43 PM, John Jansen <John.Jansen@microsoft.com>
>wrote:
>> I'm going to ask this again because I made the mistake of including all
>>of the summary and minutes in my last reply. I'm sure that due to that
>>error, my question was completely missed...
>>
>>> RESOLVED:
>>>
>>> - use flow-into and flow-from properties and explain the interaction
>>>with
>>> the css3 contents module definition of the content property. The
>>>flow-into
>>> and flow-from properties should be <string>
>>
>> It's very difficult to tell from the minutes why this was resolved to
>>be a string. Alex asked this as well [1]. Can anyone clarify? I'm not
>>even sure who argued to make it a string rather than in ident?
>>
>> -John
>>
>> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2011Jun/0155.html
>
>We didn't actually resolve that way, at least not to my memory.  We
>wanted to do something other than a bare ident, because it seems
>relatively likely that this is a property we'd like to later add more
>controls to, such as default flows or additional options, that may end
>up being ambiguous with user-defined flow names.  Strings or a flow()
>function, though, are both equally okay.
>
>~TJ
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 15:25:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:41 GMT