W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Expected behavior of background-clip property on the html element?

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 16:38:49 -0800
Message-ID: <4D2E4999.8050305@inkedblade.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On 01/12/2011 09:06 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:20 PM, fantasai
> <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>  wrote:
>> On 01/10/2011 03:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>>> Agreed.  The spec explicitly says that the BPA of the root element is
>>> specially defined.  It could probably use a bit of clarification in
>>> background-clip, just appending ", and thus background-clip does not
>>> have any effect when specified on it." to the end of the first
>>> sentence in that note.
>>
>> The background-clip property doesn't exist in CSS2.1, so I think it
>> would be rather incongruous to add such a phrase to the end of that
>> sentence.
>
> Hm?  I was talking about the line in B&B in the definition of background-clip.

Well, the only quoted spec references and quoted text in the thread was
from CSS2.1, so I assumed you were talking about the quoted text from
CSS2.1.

I think I see the note you're talking about in CSS3. Updated.

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 00:39:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:36 GMT