W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Expected behavior of background-clip property on the html element?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 09:06:37 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTin226jpjO18uTp=PgJvT5LVG3hbNTbb1fT1uaMs@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:20 PM, fantasai
<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> On 01/10/2011 03:50 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
>> Agreed.  The spec explicitly says that the BPA of the root element is
>> specially defined.  It could probably use a bit of clarification in
>> background-clip, just appending ", and thus background-clip does not
>> have any effect when specified on it." to the end of the first
>> sentence in that note.
>
> The background-clip property doesn't exist in CSS2.1, so I think it
> would be rather incongruous to add such a phrase to the end of that
> sentence.

Hm?  I was talking about the line in B&B in the definition of background-clip.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 17:17:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:35 GMT