- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 17:53:38 +0100
- To: Jeremie Patonnier <jeremie.patonnier@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Le 12/01/11 17:48, Jeremie Patonnier a écrit : > But any way, it works but it is really surprising (even if logical when > you think about it). > > May be it could be simpler to understand for end users to have a default > value of 0 for the a box's children. > Do you think it's something acceptable ? That would be an acceptable compromise but we have to make that clear in the spec. We need to discuss that with implementors, and in particular Mozilla since it probably has deep impact on XUL. </Daniel>
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2011 17:05:24 UTC