- From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 19:12:43 +0000
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
[fantasai:] > The behavior you want is most definitely the more reasonable > interpretation. :) It's actually already in the spec: > > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#background-positioning-area > # If the 'background-attachment' value for this image is 'fixed', then > # this property has no effect: in this case the background positioning > # area is the initial containing block [CSS21]. > > http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/colors.html#propdef-background-position > # If the background image is fixed within the viewport (see the > # 'background-attachment' property), the image is placed relative to > # the viewport instead of the element's padding box. > > I'll make a link from the instance of "background positioning area" you're > quoting to its definition (partially quoted above); that should help. Are > there any other clarifications you'd like to see? That works ! While we're at it, what is the behavior of background-clip in this case ? I assume it's ignored but it wouldn't hurt to be explicit.
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 19:13:18 UTC