- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:49:28 -0800
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 02/10/2011 11:12 AM, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > [fantasai:] >> The behavior you want is most definitely the more reasonable >> interpretation. :) It's actually already in the spec: >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#background-positioning-area >> # If the 'background-attachment' value for this image is 'fixed', then >> # this property has no effect: in this case the background positioning >> # area is the initial containing block [CSS21]. >> >> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/colors.html#propdef-background-position >> # If the background image is fixed within the viewport (see the >> # 'background-attachment' property), the image is placed relative to >> # the viewport instead of the element's padding box. >> >> I'll make a link from the instance of "background positioning area" you're >> quoting to its definition (partially quoted above); that should help. Are >> there any other clarifications you'd like to see? > > That works ! While we're at it, what is the behavior of background-clip in > this case ? I assume it's ignored but it wouldn't hurt to be explicit. I'm guessing the definition of background-clip has the answer: http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-background/#the-background-clip :p ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 10 February 2011 22:50:02 UTC