W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2011

Re: Repeating gradient syntax question

From: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:00:02 -0800
Cc: Antony Kennedy <antony@silversquid.com>, Fraser Pearce <me@fraserpearce.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-id: <38F21491-D6BE-4435-8A42-72CB9D11A354@me.com>
To: Fraser Pearce <frazor77@gmail.com>
On Feb 8, 2011, at 12:41 am, Fraser Pearce wrote:

> On 7 Feb 2011, at 19:05, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote:
> 
>> 
>> In earlier discussion on this list, I argued for using different gradient functions for things which cannot be interpolated for animation. That's why we have the 'repeating' versions of the gradient functions.
>> 
> 
> Can you point me to that conversation so I can read the back story please. 

The thread including <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2010Sep/0226.html>.

Simon
Received on Tuesday, 8 February 2011 18:00:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:37 GMT