W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2011

Re: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:29:10 -0800
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDBj1FK_diYHGhKzfP0Fn8POdkgxtT+rP4JefEHdcFPDDA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Cc: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com> wrote:
> I agree. There is no benefit in having wrapping and direction in one
> property.
>
> It may still be useful to have flex-flow as a shortcut. Should there be
>
>  flex-direction: row | column | row-reverse | column-reverse
>  flex-wrap: nowrap | wrap | wrap-reverse
>  flex-flow: <flex-direction> || <flex-wrap>
>
> ?

This sounds good to me.  I'll make the edits shortly.

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 17:30:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:47 GMT