RE: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

I agree. There is no benefit in having wrapping and direction in one property.

It may still be useful to have flex-flow as a shortcut. Should there be

                flex-direction: row | column | row-reverse | column-reverse
                flex-wrap: nowrap | wrap | wrap-reverse
flex-flow: <flex-direction> || <flex-wrap>
?

From: ojan@google.com [mailto:ojan@google.com] On Behalf Of Ojan Vafai
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 4:12 PM
To: www-style@w3.org
Subject: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

We should split wrapping out of flex-flow into a flex-wrap property. It made sense to combine them into flex-flow before when we had physical values, but now that we only have logical values, there's no benefit to since there are no invalid combinations.

Ojan