W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2011

RE: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 00:20:36 +0000
To: Ojan Vafai <ojan@chromium.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <D51C9E849DDD0D4EA38C2E539856928412D7D44B@TK5EX14MBXC218.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
I agree. There is no benefit in having wrapping and direction in one property.

It may still be useful to have flex-flow as a shortcut. Should there be

                flex-direction: row | column | row-reverse | column-reverse
                flex-wrap: nowrap | wrap | wrap-reverse
flex-flow: <flex-direction> || <flex-wrap>
?

From: ojan@google.com [mailto:ojan@google.com] On Behalf Of Ojan Vafai
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 4:12 PM
To: www-style@w3.org
Subject: [css3-flexbox] flex-flow: wrap

We should split wrapping out of flex-flow into a flex-wrap property. It made sense to combine them into flex-flow before when we had physical values, but now that we only have logical values, there's no benefit to since there are no invalid combinations.

Ojan
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2011 00:21:10 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:47 GMT