W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [css3-images] image-* property split

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 14:30:55 -0700
Message-ID: <4E39BE0F.6020600@inkedblade.net>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: www-style@w3.org
On 08/03/2011 02:14 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, fantasai<fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>  wrote:
>> We have multiple implementations of image-resolution, so that should
>> definitely stay. And I remember writing tests for image-orientation
>> for HP, so that probably also should stay unless someone can make a
>> case for that part of the spec being unstable.
>
> I'd like to synchronize the syntax of image-resolution with the syntax
> of the resolution argument in image() (basically, this would involve
> adding 'snap' to image-resolution and 'from-image' to image()).
> However, that can be done in Images 4.
>
> Everyone else, are you okay with me adding image-resolution and
> image-orientation back Images 3?  Should they be marked as at-risk, or
> put in plainly?

I suggest to mark image-orientation at-risk, but image-resolution we have
two implementations of so I don't think it's needed. Or add 'snap' to it
and mark 'snap' as at-risk. :)

~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 21:31:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT