W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2011

Re: [css3-images] image-* property split

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2011 14:14:40 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAWBYDDz0Gc60bLEhE=OMqsmQH54Eyd_7Es7Bn+vDBHtrLP+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 12:56 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
> We have multiple implementations of image-resolution, so that should
> definitely stay. And I remember writing tests for image-orientation
> for HP, so that probably also should stay unless someone can make a
> case for that part of the spec being unstable.

I'd like to synchronize the syntax of image-resolution with the syntax
of the resolution argument in image() (basically, this would involve
adding 'snap' to image-resolution and 'from-image' to image()).
However, that can be done in Images 4.

Everyone else, are you okay with me adding image-resolution and
image-orientation back Images 3?  Should they be marked as at-risk, or
put in plainly?

~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2011 21:15:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:43 GMT