- From: Alexander Shpack <shadowkin@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:33:32 +0300
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
>> * UA feature, no spec available. > > You missed: > > * Spec is incomplete (or nonexistent), UAs implement wildly different > things My third option is same. :) > > Not really, no, for prefixed properties. Ok, what about next behavior? -something: foo; Use standard mode first, otherwise custom behavior -ua-something: foo; Use custom behavior something: foo; Use standard mode only First case is more useful for web-developers. Feature is important, not UA support. I don't want to remember, when or how concrete UA supports concrete feature. Just give me required! > > Then you probably don't want to be using prefixed things at all. I don't want to write 5 (five!) similar rules. :)
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 19:33:59 UTC