- From: Alexander Shpack <shadowkin@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 21:29:52 +0300
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
> > This has been discussed before. It suffers from the fact that, when > browsers differ from the standard in their experimental > implementations, they quite commonly differ in slightly incompatible > ways. Folding them into a single property so that you can't target > each browser with different code means that the prefix is somewhat > unusable. > My proposition didn't cancel current behavior. Possible 3 statements: * Spec is incomplete, UA support it in testing mode. * Spec is complete, UA support feature in standard mode. * UA feature, no spec available. Developers will use something: foo; in second case. Otherwise -ua-something: foo; in third case. And -something: foo; for first one; (use - instead *), because every UA should be as closer as possible to spec, is not right? I do not want to change my CSS every 3 month, because UA behavior or Spec was changed. CSS hacks legalization is very bad idea, IMO.
Received on Friday, 22 April 2011 18:30:20 UTC