W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > September 2010

Re: [css3-images] Linear gradients feedback

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 13:04:49 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimcKnRgqFtVeSp6NU10sViFwMeW18qoZaDyLyhX@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 1:00 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sep 7, 2010, at 12:41 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:33 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:
>>> Why aren't we using the grammar at the bottom of
>>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Aug/0232.html
>>> ? I think that's much more straightforward.
>>
>> Except for using a comma instead of "to", that's what I'm looking at
>> right now.  We just want to split the angle case out into a separate
>> function, and need a name for it.  I think I'll just use
>> angle-gradient() until someone gives me something better.
>>
>> Brad, are you still going to send your feedback about why you think we
>> can do everything with just an angle?
>
> Yes, sorry; I had a busy weekend and my daytime is very busy during the week. I'll try to finish what I started writing, in the next few days.

Any progress?  I'm waiting for your feedback before I decide on an
approach and make edits.

~TJ
Received on Thursday, 16 September 2010 20:05:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:31 GMT