- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 19:06:25 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday 2010-10-22 23:40 +0000, Sylvain Galineau wrote: > So either the former picks a unit or we extend the optional-unit-for-zero exception of <length> > to times for consistency. Although in the latter case it would seem coherent to do the same for > frequencies and angles as well. It's the bigger change but I lean towards the latter. It'd be > odd if width:0 was valid but not transition-duration:0 or transform:rotate(0). (Although that > ship may already have sailed, implementation-wise...). The gradient syntax depends on unitless zero not being allowed for angles. See the thread starting with http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Nov/0043.html . I believe we agreed on that at some point following the thread, though I'm not sure. -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Saturday, 23 October 2010 02:06:58 UTC