W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [CSS21] Another ambiguity in the definition of "containing block"

From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:35:23 -0700
Message-ID: <4C197BDB.2070803@inkedblade.net>
To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 06/16/2010 06:22 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
> On 6/16/10 8:04 PM, fantasai wrote:
>> I don't know. The best thing to do might be to write it however makes
>> sense to you, and then I'll try to make sense of it and rerender it
>> into spec prose, like we did for anonymous table boxes. :)
> That seems like a waste of time (and had I known you were going to
> rewrite the anonymous table boxes section from scratch I probably
> wouldn't have bothered writing it up in detail)... Why is me writing
> something, you writing something else, and the two of us then trying to
> figure out whether they say the same thing better than you just writing
> your version to start with?

Because I don't really understand what I'm supposed to write? :)
I could not have come up with that anonymous boxes proposal if
I didn't have yours to work off of.

Received on Thursday, 17 June 2010 01:35:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:36 UTC