W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: [CSS21] Another ambiguity in the definition of "containing block"

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 21:22:13 -0400
Message-ID: <4C1978C5.9040908@mit.edu>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On 6/16/10 8:04 PM, fantasai wrote:
> I don't know. The best thing to do might be to write it however makes
> sense to you, and then I'll try to make sense of it and rerender it
> into spec prose, like we did for anonymous table boxes. :)

That seems like a waste of time (and had I known you were going to 
rewrite the anonymous table boxes section from scratch I probably 
wouldn't have bothered writing it up in detail)...  Why is me writing 
something, you writing something else, and the two of us then trying to 
figure out whether they say the same thing better than you just writing 
your version to start with?

-Boris
Received on Thursday, 17 June 2010 01:22:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:28 GMT