W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > June 2010

Re: flexible grid requirements

From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:25:19 -0500
Cc: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Message-id: <59BE5F68-7DD2-43EF-8B2F-1B18EDB30A99@apple.com>
To: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@microsoft.com>
One possibility would be to use table-layout: grid and not introduce any new display values.

dave

On Jun 7, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Alex Mogilevsky wrote:

> There will of course be an ‘inline-grid’. For the other permutations, whatever applies to a table applies to a grid. If there is ever ‘table-cell-table’ there will be a ‘table-cell-grid’ (or equivalent use of ‘display-inside’/‘display-outside’ if we take that route)
>  
> From: Andrew Fedoniouk [mailto:news@terrainformatica.com] 
> Sent: Monday, June 07, 2010 9:23 AM
> To: Alex Mogilevsky; www-style list
> Cc: David Hyatt; Tab Atkins Jr.
> Subject: Re: flexible grid requirements
>  
> Regarding Requirement #1:
> A “grid” is a ‘display’ value, a coordinate system applicable to some or all blocks, or both.
> If it is a value of 'display' then are there all other variants like inline-grid, list-item-grid and table-cell-grid?
>  
> -- 
> Andrew Fedoniouk
>  
> http://terrainformatica.com
>  
Received on Monday, 7 June 2010 21:26:25 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:28 GMT