- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:20:33 -0700
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Jul 15, 2010, at 2:14 PM, Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com> wrote: > Any solution that would require authors > to monkey with input values when jumping from one feature to the other would be a fail imo. We already have to monkey with it, because if we assign a blur value we don't have a intuitive way of knowing how much space (in pixels) that blur will cover. So we assign a guess, view it in a browser, see if it should be bigger or smaller, rinse and repeat. With a good editor that could be easier, but it's still not as good as assigning a number and then knowing exactly what it will do to the shadow.
Received on Friday, 16 July 2010 00:21:41 UTC