- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:30:59 -0700
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Jul 14, 2010, at 2:16 PM, Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com> wrote: > Anyway, the point is, IMO it's a *must* to have pixel-perfect > definitions here. Did you get the impression somehow that we were not asking for something that could be measured with pixel perfection? Saying "run it through a function and see if what comes out matches other specs that also do not define the results" hardly seems seems like an argument in favor of pixel perfect results.
Received on Wednesday, 14 July 2010 22:32:11 UTC