W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > February 2010

RE: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined

From: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2010 01:51:59 +0000
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <045A765940533D4CA4933A4A7E32597E10D5D852@TK5EX14MBXC111.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
#3 is the simplest and clearest all around imo: the behavior is undefined. 

From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2010 4:36 PM
To: Sylvain Galineau
Cc: www-style@w3.org
Subject: Re: [css3-background] border-radius color transitions using gradients recommended but undefined


   In the paragraph
     # It is not defined what these transitions look like, but a gradient is recommended
     # for color transitions that don't involve dotted or dashed borders.
   replace 'recommended' with 'suggested'.
     | It is not defined what these transitions look like, but a gradient is suggested
     | for color transitions that don't involve dotted or dashed borders.

and Proposal 3 is
   In the paragraph
     # It is not defined what these transitions look like, but a gradient is recommended
     # for color transitions that don't involve dotted or dashed borders.
   replace the comma with a period and remove the rest of the sentence, i.e.
     | It is not defined what these transitions look like.

Let me know if either 2 or 3 is satisfactory, and if so, we can take this to the WG for a formal decision. (If not, please explain what the remaining problems are.)

Thanks~

~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 25 February 2010 01:52:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:24 GMT