W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

RE: [css-ruby] Proposal to publish new WD

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:17:20 -0000
To: "'fantasai'" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <044901cb92d3$45fceef0$d1f6ccd0$@org>
Done (as issues for now).

Btw, why did you change the title of the document to CSS3 Ruby Annotation Module?  I think this is not a good idea.  The Ruby Annotation spec is about annotation, and it helps people keep the two specs separate in their minds to have the word annotation in only one.


Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)


> -----Original Message-----
> From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net]
> Sent: 02 December 2010 21:06
> To: Richard Ishida
> Cc: www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [css-ruby] Proposal to publish new WD
> Importance: High
> On 12/01/2010 12:30 PM, Richard Ishida wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'd like to publish the version of the CSS3 Ruby Module at
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-ruby/
> > as a new WD.  This will take the ruby module out of CR and revert it to a
> Working Draft.
> Other issues:
> 1. I think you should mark as an issue that the spec needs to address
> anonymous box generation rules (and to make them compatible with HTML5
> ruby markup).
> 2. The line-breaking section should say that line breaks are only
> allowed within ruby if the ruby base text can be broken at that
> point. E.g. if complex Ruby is used to annotate the two morphemes
> of "butterfly", the fact that we have added ruby annotations should
> not cause a line breaking opportunity to be present between "butter"
> and "fly".
> ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 10:17:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:45 UTC