W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2010

RE: [css-ruby] Proposal to publish new WD

From: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2010 10:17:20 -0000
To: "'fantasai'" <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <044901cb92d3$45fceef0$d1f6ccd0$@org>
Done (as issues for now).

Btw, why did you change the title of the document to CSS3 Ruby Annotation Module?  I think this is not a good idea.  The Ruby Annotation spec is about annotation, and it helps people keep the two specs separate in their minds to have the word annotation in only one.

RI 

============
Richard Ishida
Internationalization Lead
W3C (World Wide Web Consortium)

http://www.w3.org/International/
http://rishida.net/




> -----Original Message-----
> From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net]
> Sent: 02 December 2010 21:06
> To: Richard Ishida
> Cc: www-style@w3.org
> Subject: Re: [css-ruby] Proposal to publish new WD
> Importance: High
> 
> On 12/01/2010 12:30 PM, Richard Ishida wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > I'd like to publish the version of the CSS3 Ruby Module at
> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-ruby/
> > as a new WD.  This will take the ruby module out of CR and revert it to a
> Working Draft.
> 
> Other issues:
> 
> 1. I think you should mark as an issue that the spec needs to address
> anonymous box generation rules (and to make them compatible with HTML5
> ruby markup).
> 
> 2. The line-breaking section should say that line breaks are only
> allowed within ruby if the ruby base text can be broken at that
> point. E.g. if complex Ruby is used to annotate the two morphemes
> of "butterfly", the fact that we have added ruby annotations should
> not cause a line breaking opportunity to be present between "butter"
> and "fly".
> 
> ~fantasai
Received on Friday, 3 December 2010 10:17:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:34 GMT