W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [css3-background]Positioning of box-shadow blurs?

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 18:43:16 -0700
Message-Id: <DD948A22-45C0-4C9E-B68C-2D49A9738F72@gmail.com>
To: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Alex Meiburg <timeroot.alex@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Yeah, I like that better.

On Apr 29, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>  
wrote:

>> I also think the word
>> "grow" can be replaced with something more accurate and precise,  
>> but I'm
>> not sure what exactly yet. "to be thickened" is more the right idea  
>> than "to
>> grow", but not all that precise.
>
> Perhaps "expand" and "contract" evoke more of the right  
> visualization.  To me, those words imply that some "restructuring"  
> of relative sizes and positions of the components of a shape will  
> happen.
Received on Friday, 30 April 2010 01:44:02 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:26 GMT