W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation, do we need to change the process?

From: Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 16:09:00 +0900
Message-ID: <s2o8c9249b71004150009j6bbd15acx480db72d2951bc35@mail.gmail.com>
To: www-style@w3.org
Very nice Eduard, thank you.

In the section "How can non-members contribute to CSS?", a link to the
"Test suites" page may be helpful. I believe this is the link:
(http://wiki.csswg.org/test) .

How do people suppose to know which test cases are missing/incomplete
or erroneous? The closest page I found is this one:
(http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/Test/) but it is still not so clear to
me. For example, where are the rest of the modules? Why "border and
backgrounds" CSS Module does not have test suites? does that mean that
they are not required or that are missing?

If there is any list with all the required tests, then we could add
that link in this FAQ document. If that page does not exist, then we
will need to specify how people can search for missing/incomplete or
incorrect tests. Besides that, I don't think we need to add more
information to the "test suites"  as it is suppose to be covered in
the "Test suites" page.

The "full-instructions" page of the W3C mailing list is not very
informative. It is not your fault, of course, but I couldn't find a
more general guideline for posting, like this one:
which mention for example to do not use Top-posting, no HTML, and so
on.. Is there any page like that around here?

Did you take a look to the WHATWG FAQ page?
(http://wiki.whatwg.org/wiki/FAQ), it may be useful...

There is a link in: www-style@w3.org but it is suppose to be "mailto:"
instead of "http://"

Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 07:09:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 2 May 2016 14:38:34 UTC