On Apr 12, 2010, at 6:47 PM, Brian Manthos wrote:
>> If we do look at 'background-clip', then perhaps we use whichever one
>> in the background that is biggest.
>
> <style>
> H1, H2, H3
> {
> border:1px;
> border-radius:25%;
> padding:1px;
> }
> H1 {
> background-clip:border-box,padding-box,content-box;
> }
> H2 {
> background-clip:padding-box,content-box;
> }
> H3 {
> background-clip:content-box;
> }
> </style>
>
> H1 should clip to the border-box curve, H2 to the padding-box curve, and H3 to the content-box curve.
That's what I'm thinking.
> Given that neither padding nor border widths can be negative, it remains conveniently simple.
I'm not sure I follow what you mean about the negative widths. Can you elaborate?
> I don't know the answer, but it looks like something needs to change or
>> be clarified. I WOULD like overflow to clip to the inner curve when
>> appropriate, and to me that means also clipping the straight portions
>> of the box too, to a box that aligns with those curves.
>
> So if "background-clip:padding-box;" was added to this example...
> http://ieblog.members.winisp.net/misc/sylvain.border-radius.example2.html
>
> then overflow clipping should clip to the white shape in the right rendering of this image...
> http://ieblog.members.winisp.net/images/sylvain_rounded_corners_2.png
>
>
> Is my interpretation correct?
That is my understanding, yes.
Received on Tuesday, 13 April 2010 05:37:15 UTC