W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation, do we need to change the process?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:22:14 -0700
Message-ID: <v2hdd0fbad1004120822za3c18b84hc23f4bedbad71779@mail.gmail.com>
To: Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com> wrote:
> A bit later than expected, but here it goes ^^
> Note that this should be properly reviewed by the WG before going
> "live": my knowledge on the processes is quite limited, and most of
> what I've included is information available from either the W3C
> website or this thread.
> Also, it's based on what *I* thought would be the stuff potential
> contributors would need/like to know, so it may be worth reviewing by
> other contributors to see if something should be added/removed.
> My original intent was to include all the "boilerplate" html code to
> mimic the CSS site's design; but that would have been highly
> error-prone and would have bloated the document; so I hope you have
> some kind of template you can apply to it.

I like it!  Hits a lot of relevant points and is very revealing on
many issues.  If nobody else has any issues, I'll clean it up and
format it for the site.

Thanks, Eduard!

Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 15:23:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:36 UTC