W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: transitions vs. animations

From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 02:19:32 +0200
Message-ID: <19389.8468.226226.646599@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
To: Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com>
Cc: "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Perry Smith wrote:

 > > How would you like to fill in the empty boxes?:
 > >
 > >   http://people.opera.com/howcome/2010/ta/index.html
 > 
 > For case 2b and 2c, I think Tab's ideas now work by adding the  
 > animation to what I call the "unadorned" selector (i.e. the foo  
 > selector in your example).  I believe you would want the "play-in"  
 > concept so it plays when it transitions to that state but does not  
 > play when the page is first drawn.

I'd love to add a column with Tab's proposals. Anther tab, so to say :)

Tab?

Cheers,

-h&kon
              Håkon Wium Lie                          CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com                  http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 00:20:09 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:26 GMT