W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: transitions vs. animations

From: Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 19:12:35 -0500
Cc: Chris Marrin <cmarrin@apple.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-Id: <AA5D607C-D050-4F13-8E99-D21DEFB2C359@gmail.com>
To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>

On Apr 7, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Håkon Wium Lie wrote:

>
>> 2) Additional ways of triggering an animation
>>
>> This is a good feature to discuss. I just don't think "on-exit" and
>> the related concepts are a clear way to express it.
>
> How would you like to fill in the empty boxes?:
>
>   http://people.opera.com/howcome/2010/ta/index.html

For case 2b and 2c, I think Tab's ideas now work by adding the  
animation to what I call the "unadorned" selector (i.e. the foo  
selector in your example).  I believe you would want the "play-in"  
concept so it plays when it transitions to that state but does not  
play when the page is first drawn.
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 00:13:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:26 GMT