- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:55:02 +0200
- To: "Eli Morris-Heft" <eli.morris.heft@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:44:53 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > (Plus, by existing precedent, the .1 designation is just for when we > accumulate enough errata for a document that it becomes difficult to > tell just *what* has been errata'd, and so we fold the errata into the > main document. We don't do errata until a document is 'frozen', > though (before then, we just modify the draft), and we can't generally > add features in errata.) Actually, the .1 designation is most likely a one-time thing. It was done because CSS2 was created in an era that did lacked the Candidate Recommendation phase and was therefore not sufficiently tested and worked out. -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:55:53 UTC