W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:55:02 +0200
To: "Eli Morris-Heft" <eli.morris.heft@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vasrp00x64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:44:53 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
> (Plus, by existing precedent, the .1 designation is just for when we
> accumulate enough errata for a document that it becomes difficult to
> tell just *what* has been errata'd, and so we fold the errata into the
> main document.  We don't do errata until a document is 'frozen',
> though (before then, we just modify the draft), and we can't generally
> add features in errata.)

Actually, the .1 designation is most likely a one-time thing. It was done  
because CSS2 was created in an era that did lacked the Candidate  
Recommendation phase and was therefore not sufficiently tested and worked  

Anne van Kesteren
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:55:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 11 February 2015 12:34:35 UTC