W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:55:02 +0200
To: "Eli Morris-Heft" <eli.morris.heft@gmail.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: "Brad Kemper" <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.vasrp00x64w2qv@annevk-t60>
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:44:53 +0200, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>  
wrote:
> (Plus, by existing precedent, the .1 designation is just for when we
> accumulate enough errata for a document that it becomes difficult to
> tell just *what* has been errata'd, and so we fold the errata into the
> main document.  We don't do errata until a document is 'frozen',
> though (before then, we just modify the draft), and we can't generally
> add features in errata.)

Actually, the .1 designation is most likely a one-time thing. It was done  
because CSS2 was created in an era that did lacked the Candidate  
Recommendation phase and was therefore not sufficiently tested and worked  
out.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:55:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:26 GMT