W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > April 2010

Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Apr 2010 23:02:07 -0700
Message-Id: <04A68559-8E54-493B-8675-C39EF7056DBE@gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>


On Apr 4, 2010, at 10:39 PM, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:

> On Monday 2010-04-05 10:47 +0900, Alberto Lepe wrote:
>> Is there any other objection?
>> Who else is supporting this addition?
>
> To be clear:  adding a feature requires that we do another last
> call, in which anybody can send comments (on any part of the spec,
> not just the changes), and then reaching working group consensus on
> the correct response to all the last call comments received,
> allowing the commenters the chance to object, etc.  That's a good
> bit of work -- and work that I probably wouldn't a consider a
> priority over other things I could be doing -- I think volunteering
> to edit css3-color was probably a mistake.
>
> I'd sort of like to take a subset of the featureset that was in CR
> in 2003 to Recommendation; this working group hasn't had a very good
> record lately of advancing documents to Recommendation, and we're
> pretty close on this one.
>
> I have no objection to implementing this, though.  (I'd sort of like
> to hear an opinion from Molly or somebody else involved in teaching
> CSS to newcomers, though.)
>
> If the working group agrees, are you volunteering to join the
> working group and do the administrative work described above to push
> this spec through another last call with this addition?
>
> -David

Maybe it would be faster to have it as the only thing in a CSS4 color  
module?
Received on Monday, 5 April 2010 06:02:47 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:26 GMT