W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [css3-selectors] LC issues #9+

From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:05:07 +0200
Message-ID: <4AE2DF63.9090302@moonhenge.net>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
fantasai wrote:
> Anton Prowse wrote:
>>
>>>> 6.6.5. :first-child pseudo-class
>>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#first-child-pseudo) 
>>>> :
> Added a statement to the Terminology section specifying that examples
> are given in XML/HTML syntax:
>    http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors3/#terminology
> 

Great!

>>>> 7.1. The ::first-line pseudo-element
>>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#first-line) :
>>>>
>>>>   # The selector p::first-line does not match any real HTML element. It
>>>>   # does match a pseudo-element that conforming user agents will insert
>>>>   # at the beginning of every paragraph.
>>>>
>>>> Issue 21b:  s/The selector p::first-line/In an HTML document, for
>>>> example, the selector p::first-line/
>>>
>>> Since the sentence technically isn't inaccurate, I'm going to leave 
>>> this one.
>>
>> Not sure I like this!  Actually, in retrospect the problem lies with the
>> example above the quoted sentence:
>>
>>   # The above rule means "change the letters of the first line of every
>> paragraph to uppercase".
>>
>> s/The above rule/In HTML, the above rule/
>>
>> or
>>
>> s/paragraph/p element/
>>
>> To me, leaving the quoted sentence unchanged seems more reasonable in
>> the light of the first variant of this new proposed change, but I would
>> still find it incongruous with the second.
> 
> Changed s/paragraph/p element/ and shifted the paragraph into the example.
> 
> 
> Please let me know if this addresses your comments.

It does, thanks!

Cheers,
Anton Prowse
http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Saturday, 24 October 2009 11:07:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:21 GMT