W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2009

Re: [css3-selectors] LC Issues #8

From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2009 13:02:09 +0200
Message-ID: <4AE2DEB1.4070306@moonhenge.net>
To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
CC: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>


Anton Prowse wrote:
> fantasai wrote:
>> Anton Prowse wrote:
>>> 7.2. The ::first-letter pseudo-element
>>> (http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-selectors-20090310/#first-letter) :
>>>
>>
>> I've rearranged that section to split out the CSS-specific discussion:
>>   http://dev.w3.org/csswg/selectors3/#first-letter
> 
> I very much like the new ordering, thanks!  Just one trivial point:
> 
>   # If the letters that would form the ::first-letter are not in the
>   # same element, such as "'T" in <p>'<em>T..., the UA may create a
>   # ::first-letter pseudo-element from one of the elements, both
>   # elements, or simply not create a pseudo-element.
>   #
>   # [...]
>   #
>   # In CSS the first letter of a table-cell or inline-block cannot be
>   # the first letter of an ancestor element. Thus, in <DIV><P
>   # STYLE="display: inline-block">Hello<BR>Goodbye</P> etcetera</DIV>
>   # the first letter of the DIV is not the letter "H". In fact, the DIV
>   # doesn't have a first letter.
> 
> In each of these sentences, can we insert "the HTML fragment" before the
> fragment?
> 

Scratch that; In the light of the recent change to the Terminology
section, this is no longer necessary.

Cheers,
Anton Prowse
http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Saturday, 24 October 2009 11:04:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:21 GMT