W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > May 2009

Re: CSS3 Web Fonts issue with ?block on downl oad?

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 15:19:51 -0700
Message-ID: <7e1f93760905071519s37c4c423h66e76b4b8f7f7faa@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
Cc: Adam Twardoch <list.adam@twardoch.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 11:59 AM, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote:

> I never said the solution couldn't be improved upon, and I never opposed
> the suggestion of progressive streaming.  In fact I think that's a good
> idea.
>
> With existing technology, the choice is between always flickering all of
> the text on the page, or having text pop in and risking some visual jumping.
>  I never said this sort of jumping would never occur in the latter case, but
> the choices are between "always look bad" and "occasionally look bad" when
> dealing with what we have currently.  WebKit has opted for "occasionally
> look bad."
>
> An even better solution is obviously "never look bad"
>

David,

What do you think about the idea of having some basic metrics load first
(somehow), and using that on a synthetic font, so that a person could begin
reading and then continue with a non-jarring change once the rest of the
font data loaded? I guess in an EOF, that would just be the first part of
the font to load, but in regular fonts it would need to be either a separate
file or embedded in the CSS?

You wouldn't have to support the whole synthetic font specs, just enough to
get the glyphs in the right positions without overlapping.
Received on Thursday, 7 May 2009 22:20:32 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 26 March 2013 17:20:18 GMT